The further study of the other physics.

Everyone or at least most people are familiar with atoms. These things are often used by science to manipulate matter in new ways. However, I find them to be only one way to look at nature, albeit the observed and collapsed version of it.

This means to say that while their are others , they are not physical like atoms are. While you can make ascription and say these other physics are physical , its important to note that for the most part, in the available technology they are unavailable as physical things. Because the atom is the only one we can observe with tools of science.

Oddly however, these particles exist in the distortion of these informations. While some will call this Virtual or perhaps entirely false, they have use in universe creation and experimentation. Since they , through altering the physical output of a machine that reads the information creates new informers on these other substances. While some would argue that making false input and output on the atom would be wrong, in simplistic terms its all virtual.

So even though one says that it is the atom that is true, the other particle with distorted information exists separately from the atom in the same place. One must simply find it in the distortion, in the errors. However it is important to note that often, but not always , these particles cause the same or similar effects to the atom because of dissonance or the fact that both create the same thing.

These new particles are useful in a slightly different way, because if you create a "False" output and explain it, then apply it to the sciences in an attempt to replicate it in the fashion discussed in the uses and how to of alternate physics post I made, then the errors and "False" assumptions become available through the "True" assumptions.

Therefore , through this , one can create artificial studies of false information and then apply that information, to construct the artificial particle and its new effect. Thereby creating a new substance that behaves according to the thing discovered in the distortion and one can say that they took advantage of that phenomenon to achieve it because while it was not a true informer, it was because it gave information on the topic of reality that can be used.

However , science is for actual or physical phenomena. This idea is technically not science because science concerns itself with only the physical atom and the ideas of a single thing that explains reality. Without science as it is, this could not function,

Because while this concept is great in creating new tools and behaviors, it requires scientific or at least accurate knowledge of the collapsed or physical portion with the more cloudy error. I'm saying this to avoid a total removal of science, because while it may be true that you can create new effects with error, you want the actual true or more accurately physical effect to thereby create the effect described in the error. Therefore , I consider this idea a separate concept to science.

Now before I continue , I will offer an example. But first i would like to point out that often these things are special tricks and can sometimes be completely in your mind, other times they can actually useful.

For example cold fusion, while not possible in the way it was often claimed to be done, can simply be done by building essentially a large solar panel on a "Reactor".The point here with that example is that , while certain things are possible they manifest in strange ways.

However, other things like water that floats in the air is significantly more interesting. This can be done with a clear balloon containing water, which is attached to hidden wire, either on the ceiling or a drone unseen.

The point here is that these things are as the magicians tricks, not the wizards magic, the magicians tricks of illusion. However , some are genuinely interesting and can very much change the way we look at things. In fact most of this stuff can be taken as it is, without the need to believe it is flying water or a cold fusion reactor, because they appear as such.

However, sometimes they create genuine new technology we didn't once have that can be used in other fields and areas of life. Its a means to find new things to invent that are based off the incorrect assumptions and errors we often make. While also allowing them to be those incorrect assumptions through the reasoning that follows. Which should like anything be taken as you like it because you shouldn't be forced to believe it is true if you don't want to.

The reasoning for why these things are truly real and not errors is that the things we perceive are empty shells. Surfaces with a means to be filled with whatever meanings we put into them with our mind. However , why are they shells? Because we have no idea what anything even is, we often say it is something, but others say it is not something.

So we don't know whatever it actually is because it isn't anything but what we say it is. If we say a water has healing properties then it does simply in its filling of that portion. However, shells do function a certain way, but the shell is just an appearance and that which appears as such can be manipulated with what we say. Therefore it is inversely true that what we say and what it is can be anything.

Therefore, while something appears and functions a certain way, what we call it matters as well. So while water does not appear to have healing properties beyond the features it causes, creating a clear substance that has healing properties and tastes ( if consumed ) like water and calling it water, makes for a water with healing properties. Therefore , the appearance or shell and the thought or name creates the object. Manipulating theses things , we can create certain substances that are the things we say they are.

Some will say this is total and utter bullshit, because it is not water and this is true, because it is water with healing properties. Since the name defines the shell and the shell is simply whatever it is. As long as the appearance or shell fits the defining feature of the name, it is what you say it is. Because when we came to learn language we defined the things and shells we saw as what they did in our view, by modifying what we call something we change the way we interact with it because we make half of what it is (the name) a different concept.

The interesting thing about a shell, is that its contents are anything, however, one must remember that atoms are also shells and exist in the microcosm. Another particle can be placed within a shell at any level and this functions as long as it behaves according to the shell. Since logically if I gave a shell that was water the property of explosion, it would not explode unless I made a clear liquid that exploded and called water and gave that substance the particle that explodes through that explanation.

The explanation for something is like the name , because an explanation is an idea. The shell cares not for your explanation, as long as it explains the shell. While it is true that atoms are contained in a shell, the atom is a separate entity from the shell above it, which is an appearance and behaves just like the atom, in specific ways. The explanation however can go in any direction, as long as it explains the thing in question. If it does not, while still use able, does not accurately define what it is because it goes into an alternate idea ( these things have use too, topic of essentially magic or alternate dimensions, aka passive physics).

This entire concept is not science, because science agrees on one explained portion and uses that to construct an entire system. However, this is as creating ones own explained portions for the sake of creating your world. Except one should remember that science is not to be replaced but exists as the physical rules that were discovered and their explanations, as a separate entirety.

Science is as it defines itself, in creating a world ,in this parsense, you define the rules based on those modified substances, using mental definitions and explanations fitted inside a shell which will always behave a specific way, the rules for why are up to you and in turn what science will say,but they can be those other concepts as long as they fit the definition how that specific shell functions.

 Interestingly , one can study their world greatly by advancing it through the following law. However , firstly I must give you an example of what I mean by these things. As an example we will use water, which according to science is made of 2 parts hydrogen 1 part oxygen, however we will fill the shell with a different concept, saying that water is composed of an energy that is fluid and capable of changing shape according to the laws defined in water. While you could unify this with the atom, that would be different from both the atom and the energy fluid I just described.

The energy fluid that composes water is called eneflu, this is not the fundamental composition of reality but the substance within water. However, we want more detail for our knowledge, so we will use the following tool I discovered to advance our understanding of eneflu in the free space that is a shell.

The rule is simple, any shape can fit inside a shape and anything that explains the preceding shape explains it further. Therefore, we will go deeper into the eneflu and make it composed of tiny fish which swim according to specific laws that move according to the movement of the fluid itself. These tiny fish swim in the air, which is an entirely different substance and an aspect of eneflu ( composed of air and fish).

One can through this simple rule create vast and complex systems of interaction with any shape and explain in great detail how one specific or many things function. For example, when water boils the fish do not like the heat and so logically they turn into birds that fly away into the air. This process is called fish bird exchange and is very important to the natural cycle of water. These fish transform into birds by first extending their fins and swim upwards, however the transformation occurs when they leave the air of the eneflu for the pockets of liquid forming in and around the boiling water. The boundary is a converter of sorts which helps painlessly transform the fish to birds.

As you can see, this is hardly any of the world explained in this specific chain of explanation which can be used to explain any world you desire to create ( I will be teaching other tools of world creation soon, but in advance its like saying the world is flat ) further you can modify these things to create new effects, but know that you'll then either have to go the magic root or the scientific root to create those new effects that don't exist in the substance shell.

I will demonstrate both examples now for further understanding. For example , eneflu also has the property of migrational smoke when it is boiling. This can be done both in the magic root and scientific root with different results. Migrational smoke is the capacity for the gas to move in only certain directions when its evaporating.

One can say through magic that the birds migrating are invisible because they don't want you knowing where they are going. This is a rather passive way of doing it, although you could also argue that it does migrate in the direction it goes, but I want a more extreme version for the sake of the argument.

Therefore in this case if you didn't want a magic or passive physics, you can engineer a system of random small fans above your oven , which aren't very strong but capable of moving the gas in different directions.

It's important to note that this is essentially belief, used to create a different world. However, it is another world by the definition that a world is made of an appearance and an idea. Since logically the world you know is made of what you see and what you think of it. However this also means you don't have to believe me and that's okay.

In conclusion, the nature of your reality is built from what you believe and how you make it that way. The choices by which you make your reality is how it becomes that reality , through what you put inside the portions of what you see and that through the help of science as we know it and not through its inherent alteration, can we hope to achieve more to reality. By not forcibly changing the rules that we want into the sciences , but by  placing them next to and then using them to make the thing we think and like.

Therefore , whatever you think the world is, is true but should never replace another for the sake of the comfort that dwells in having just that. Since what you say is true but can also be wrong somewhere else and this is the root to having a world of your own because a world is built from what it is, this includes science and any other, to replace it all with one is not to have one at all.

A world can be small and contain what you want and its good to have more people, but your world is truly made of the people who wanted the world, not the people who were not part of that world and who were never going to take part in it to begin with.