0 energy and the hyperposition of angles

The thing with the 0 equation is that it works but does not explain energy , which causes movement and allows something to even move. Since if their as no force to push, their would be no movement and since the equation starts with 0 , you'd think their would be no energy. This is true because their is energy but it is a part of the part your in, meaning in the context of the 0 equation, their is no energy.

Then how do things move? Through 0 shred obviously, since that is the only extra thing to 0 I ascribe.  While you think it obvious that energy must therefore come about from 0 , but how does this occur? Through the shredding , which creates a new part each moment in either its original form or a new form and so with each passing second the old 0 is replaced with a new one in a potentially new position. 

This rule is completely random and the only way it is your worlds way is due to it being that precise world, it isn't specific ( meaning their isn't a reason except every reason ). Meaning anywhere else, things could go from potato to ostrich in mere instances. The only conceivable reason for our world being this way is limitation on the infinite within the system. If you change that limit however, it is likely based on the new particle because particles echo which is a possible proof of the 0 equation.

An echo relates to the fact that it goes atoms something else in both directions and in our directions , since it can go table door. This is due to 0 shred and is an effect of it changing per motion in a new sense, and so they actually do change randomly but not due to the law limit of the world. Since an atom shreds into a chair. Chairs in turn shred into doors. 

The reason this appears not to shred , is that it does but it looks like motion, however if it were not for the coverings of our perception, which appear as they do, it would appear significantly different since things would be shredding in more directions then they already are. Further , because of the coverings things only behave one way that is specific, a cup stays as a cup, but it is not a cup either due to shred. From another angle it appears different, this is because covering is an angle of the shape you are looking at which rotated at different orientations appears different in different dimensions.

A covering is called a tensil in my view and is based on the fact that the various sides of 0 are shredding differently in all angles, meaning at certain angles thing appears covered by another, this includes the fact that a thing behind another thing is still covering a portion of that thing. However , how do I know this, what is my proof? 

Opinions, because different opinions are different angles. Except they run deeper in the fabric and function slightly differently. For example an atheist sees the world different from a theist. They perceive different aspects of reality, in that theists associate light with things an atheist does not. However , both are inherently unique views and angles of reality that both exist. 

Another thing to add based on this is the idea of hyperpositions, which are positions that are both in multiple states at once and collapsed. An example of a hyperposition would be the idea that wood is a stone, because the hyperpostion exists between the particle in the mind and the external tensile alone of wood. What is the relationship you ask? that each concept reality is a hyperposition existing on its own which can be modified at will or kept identical to what it was to begin with. 

The point is that each hyperpostion is a hidden angle of reality and that each exists independently from another. Irrelevant of what another says about the other , because that is taken from their angle. Which is a motion upon the world and its separate shred exists from a different direction on the field of any.

With this you can say wholephases don't exist , but they do if you want to because all you have to do is observe the hyperposition, if you don't they don't exist because they instantly equal 0, the problem with physicality is that 0 = anything and so disregarding a ceiling  makes a hole that looks like the ceiling, since the only shape of nothing that can fit in that location looks like that.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Maybe we just look for a better way and version of what we want, rather than bloodshed for the lowest way and version of what we got. Howe...