Paint and the concept of mind

Paint is a concept which is often used throughout my blog, albeit rarely mentioned. It is essentially what it is , paint, except three-dimensional. However  actual paint is considered a kind of paint, the reason I am not calling this plor is that paint is made of plor and something else, specifically the mental plor which together form paints. Like anything paints are arranged in forms to create new ones out of old.

Paints are polygons in simple terms that behave in specific ways, except these polygons are comprised of smaller polygons which behave in their specific ways to enable the higher functions of the higher polygon. An atom for example is a highly complex polygon, built from its internal corners and its outwards corners formed by cloud, which manifest in specific shape movement patterns. A chair in the same way is comprised of its surface polygon and inward polygon.

Some would argue that the surface polygon of a chair is not real because their is space between the polygon, this is not true in my view because the polygons inside are bonded and so linked per shape. Therefore the polygon is more complex then it initially appears , but still a true polygon.

However, one says they are not polygons and this is true because the polygon is a measuring tool for creating polygons, since using the atoms model in the most advanced form I understand ( a scientist  would know better ) the shape is a cloud in an unpredictable location, brought on by few electrons.

Therefore in the space of the size of the atom, the electron can be in any specific place within the bounds of its orbit. If one considers this or these electrons as the point, at any time the electron is in that shape of polygon. Meaning , while being just electrons, it is also any possible shape within the boundaries of that shape created by the orbit. However , overall it becomes one inherent shape, that is also always the shape you say it is.

This can be applied in our observation as well, because their is always a triangle somewhere in a round cup. Since one must simply connect the points that are essentially very tiny pixels. Within reason.

Now , a paint as you can see is essentially the whole painted into one image, which can be used to say a universe is composed of other particles or polygons that do the same thing, it remains ever within the moments in which the atom is in that shape.

This is however one interpretation of atom which enables the existence of other identical particles, identical in behavior. However we shall see a secondary approach to this , because their are holes in the paint. Paint however, is filled with nothing, which has no boundary and so represents all things. A super field of nothing, containing infinite points. Since they exist in nothing and supersede physicality by not existing at all and so do, still by being a possible shape.

However, if you say something does something it does not, it exists in nothing, except the physical portions.

Now here's the other one, the infinite regress of parts, which are based on strings which are still shapes exist just below our ability to detect them. If they exist, they contain parts we don't know that are constrained to that shape just like any other , because nothing also makes a shape and nothing has no internal shape, since the shape above it, is explained by it, the nothings outer shape is the shape above it.

While I don't know what the shape below is , its a shape, but strings can be many shapes and so its any shape, the reason is that they allow for pretty much any shape up here in mind or at least something does.

Because your mind can naturally defy the laws of physics in thought. Since if it was made of atoms it would behave like atoms , and so a hovering thought should fall and it doesn't ,if it should be an atom so it should look like an atom, but it does not because it can only be deeper in the the small direction.

It is obviously made of matter , but it crosses the distance between two pieces of matter, since itself isn't made of any particle except perhaps something that isn't and atom, but makes up atoms somehow. Since if an atom makes consciousness above it, it must somehow allow something it literally cannot do.

the only place you could be is between the electron and proton of a thousand atoms. Since one part is stable like vision and one part is unstable and changing like the electron aka perception and thought, which must inherently defy the laws to function. Meaning the proton must somehow be transferring energy between it and the electron or perhaps its deeper still and that's just one part before something beyond that. All an electron is btw , is a string.

However, even then theirs always the empty value of a negative, since in math negatives still exist and a negative is less then 0. Therefore both the positive shape that behaves the way it is described must exist in the spectrum of parts built of parts and exist in their absence anyways.

The reason for an infinite regress btw, is that  mentally the parts regress eternally and so defy conception, in that they continue to explain the upper part forever, until they end wherever you put the end. which defies the concept of physics, unless they are identical and we just put an end because we couldn't think of one yet.

The problem is the order in which they follow and may not exist in an order after a certain degree but all exist in a superspace for lack of a better term. So then we can create totems of concepts related to the nature of a particle , which we may eventually be able to build but i don't know, except that most can already be built using tricks and nanotechnology, virtual reality ( another aspect of this essay) and typical invention. At least the ones I've tried.

This also leads to the conclusion that art and virtual reality can be real, false and both dependent on the particles ascribed. Since they are essentially windows into other worlds, linked to this one through the image.

So really , its a matter of time whether paint and the concepts of creating worlds are discovered to be passive, active, passive active or all above, keeping in mind that one should test things before assuming real beyond the nothing concept.

Which by the way is still a valid argument. So while you can use the concepts I show you, they are currently only available in their nothing form, the real are beyond the limit of our particles, in and beyond the strings, where our mind must be able to perceive them through its end. Noting that they function by observing them. we can use them for concepts similar to magic then real magic maybe. If that's even necessary with the advance of tricks , nanotechnology and virtual reality. It probably is, because some want it real and so logically , certain parts are necessary for different people.