Color Meanings

What follows is a means to create entirely new concepts from nothing but color. While this is useful, it is difficult to predict what you'll get , therefore don't feel obligated to to do the things you invent through this. Pick the things you like.

A color meaning in essence is a color or group of colors with an ascribed meanings that can be combined to form new ideas. What will follow are several examples with small explanations to what they are. However , please note that mixing every color just makes brown. Which is obviously one color.

A meaning ascribed to a color can be anything, however using the color as a base allows for association. This makes finding concepts easier.

Red for example makes for passion, purple can be defined as a symbol of education. Combining the associations one can make a new concept which is to educate oneself on their passions or interests only.

Another example would be orange is transformation and green is nature, so together they form a transforming nature, which is a forest that transforms constantly. Further you can combine both a transforming nature with a passion education to form a a passionate study of transforming nature.

Truly , you can combine anything to form a new concept but it does not mean you'll take interest in it. This same concept can be applied to anything and is wholly universal and allows one to find new ideas that aren't existent yet.

This can be done with religions and spirits , but don't expect them to be accepted by the people who believed in the faiths you combined.

So then explore these concepts to find the ones you like as that should be your goal and not to unify the people through a combination of two or more faiths. Will telling the scientist to study transforming nature , over normal nature somehow improve the world because it is more unified ? NO and I can't say that enough.

Now let us look at the difference between normal nature and transforming nature, to follow up on the concepts of detail, advancement and alteration.

normal nature is the nature we know that does not change and remains relatively stable in form.

Transforming nature is a kind of nature that is erratic and ever changing, never remaining the same.

Clearly these are not the same and why one should replace one for the other is beyond me, except in that part if desired. Using this information we can expand the details to further advance the concept we created. Unifying a concept does not advance it, it unifies it. Avering a concept is how one modifies something to advance it because you add additional parts next to and not mixed into.

Transforming nature is much like unification, because it changes completely with each additional change and fusion, while we know not how transforming nature functions it is likely in the continued shifting of shapes. In comparison to normal nature , which keeps its shape, this kind of nature seems disturbing and ever changing. While we could have it somehow , it must remain in its part.

 This is essentially it for this kind of thing, except anything can be put together to create something wholly unique and different from the other thing. Don't think it replaces the first however , because  all it does is replace it with something else encouraging your things replacement.

In conclusion, mixing colors with ascribed association creates ascribed part or thing.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Maybe we just look for a better way and version of what we want, rather than bloodshed for the lowest way and version of what we got. Howe...